Scaling & Capacity Planning

Resource Model

Loki-VL-proxy is a stateless HTTP proxy with optional disk cache. Resource consumption scales with:

CPU: proportional to request rate + LogQL translation complexity
Memory: proportional to L1 cache size + concurrent request response buffers
Disk: proportional to L2 cache size (compressed, ~3.4x reduction with gzip)
Network: proportional to request rate × response size

Resource Projections

Based on benchmarks (Go 1.26.2, single core, typical Grafana dashboard workload with 60% cache hit rate):

Single Replica

Metric	10 req/s	100 req/s	1,000 req/s	10,000 req/s
CPU (cores)	0.01	0.1	0.5-1.0	4-8
Memory (MB)	50-100	100-256	256-512	512-2048
L1 Cache (entries)	1,000	5,000	10,000	50,000
L1 Cache (MB)	10-50	50-100	100-256	256-512
Network in (Mbps)	0.1	1	10	50-100
Network out (Mbps)	0.5	5	50	200-500
VL queries/s	4 (60% cached)	40	400	2,000-4,000
Goroutines	20-50	50-200	200-1,000	1,000-5,000

Disk Cache (L2)

Disk Size	Entries (compressed)	Hit Rate Boost	Use Case
1 GB	~18k	+10-15%	Small team, development
5 GB	~94k	+15-25%	Medium org, shared dashboards
10 GB	~189k	+20-30%	Large org, heavy dashboard usage
50 GB	~948k	+25-35%	Enterprise, long TTL requirements

Compression ratio: ~29% (gzip), meaning 1 GB on disk holds ~3.4 GB of raw cache data.

Fleet (Multiple Replicas)

Total req/s	Replicas	CPU (total)	Memory (total)	Disk (total)	Cache Hit Rate
10	1	0.1 core	128 MB	1 GB	60-70%
100	2	0.5 cores	512 MB	2 GB	65-75%
1,000	4	2-4 cores	1-2 GB	10 GB	70-80%
10,000	16	8-16 cores	4-8 GB	40 GB	75-85%

With fleet peer cache, the effective cache size is L1_per_pod × N + L2_per_pod × N, and cache hit rate improves because each key lives on exactly one peer (no duplication across pods).

Workload Profiles

Dashboard-Heavy (Grafana auto-refresh)

Characteristics: 70-85% repeat queries, 15-30 panels per dashboard, 5-60s refresh
Cache behavior: Very high hit rate after first load
Bottleneck: Memory (large response buffers), Network out

Dashboards	Users	req/s	Recommended
10	5	10-50	1 pod, 256MB, 1GB disk
50	25	50-250	2 pods, 512MB, 5GB disk
200	100	200-1000	4 pods, 1GB, 10GB disk
1000	500	1000-5000	8-16 pods, 2GB, 10GB disk

Explore-Heavy (Ad-hoc queries)

Characteristics: 20-30% repeat queries, unique time ranges, high cardinality
Cache behavior: Lower hit rate, disk cache catches some repeats
Bottleneck: CPU (translation), VL backend throughput

Active Users	req/s	Recommended
5	5-20	1 pod, 256MB, 1GB disk
25	25-100	2 pods, 512MB, 5GB disk
100	100-500	4 pods, 1GB, 10GB disk
500	500-2000	8 pods, 2GB, 20GB disk

Mixed (Production Typical)

Characteristics: 50% dashboards, 30% alerts, 20% explore
Cache behavior: Moderate hit rate, steady state after warm-up
Bottleneck: Balanced CPU/memory/network

Helm Values by Scale

Small (< 100 req/s)

replicaCount: 1
workload:
  kind: StatefulSet
resources:
  requests:
    cpu: 100m
    memory: 128Mi
  limits:
    cpu: 500m
    memory: 256Mi
extraArgs:
  cache-ttl: "60s"
  cache-max: "5000"
  disk-cache-path: "/cache/proxy.db"
  disk-cache-compress: "true"
persistence:
  enabled: true
  size: 1Gi

Medium (100-1,000 req/s)

replicaCount: 3
workload:
  kind: StatefulSet
resources:
  requests:
    cpu: 250m
    memory: 256Mi
  limits:
    cpu: "1"
    memory: 512Mi
extraArgs:
  cache-ttl: "60s"
  cache-max: "10000"
  disk-cache-path: "/cache/proxy.db"
  disk-cache-compress: "true"
peerCache:
  enabled: true
  discovery: dns
persistence:
  enabled: true
  size: 5Gi
horizontalPodAutoscaling:
  enabled: true
  minReplicas: 2
  maxReplicas: 6
  metrics:
    - type: Resource
      resource:
        name: cpu
        target:
          type: Utilization
          averageUtilization: 70

Large (1,000-10,000 req/s)

replicaCount: 8
workload:
  kind: StatefulSet
resources:
  requests:
    cpu: 500m
    memory: 512Mi
  limits:
    cpu: "2"
    memory: 2Gi
extraArgs:
  cache-ttl: "120s"
  cache-max: "50000"
  disk-cache-path: "/cache/proxy.db"
  disk-cache-compress: "true"
  disk-cache-flush-size: "500"
peerCache:
  enabled: true
  discovery: dns
persistence:
  enabled: true
  size: 10Gi
  storageClass: gp3  # high IOPS SSD
horizontalPodAutoscaling:
  enabled: true
  minReplicas: 4
  maxReplicas: 20
  metrics:
    - type: Resource
      resource:
        name: cpu
        target:
          type: Utilization
          averageUtilization: 60
podDisruptionBudget:
  minAvailable: 2

The current chart does not expose direct rate-limit, max-concurrency, or circuit-breaker tuning flags. The proxy currently uses built-in defaults in code:

per-client rate limit 50 req/s
per-client burst 100
global concurrent backend queries 100
circuit breaker open after 5 failures for 10s

Use HPA, cache sizing, Grafana refresh policy, and outer traffic shaping as the main scaling controls.

Monitoring Metrics

Per-Tenant (Rate, Throughput, Latency)

# Request rate per tenant
sum(rate(loki_vl_proxy_tenant_requests_total{system="loki",direction="downstream"}[5m])) by (tenant)

# P99 latency per tenant
histogram_quantile(0.99, sum(rate(loki_vl_proxy_tenant_request_duration_seconds_bucket{system="loki",direction="downstream"}[5m])) by (le, tenant))

# Error rate per tenant
sum(rate(loki_vl_proxy_tenant_requests_total{status=~"4..|5.."}[5m])) by (tenant)
  / sum(rate(loki_vl_proxy_tenant_requests_total[5m])) by (tenant)

Per-Client (User Identity)

Client identity is resolved from (priority order):

Trusted user headers when -metrics.trust-proxy-headers=true (X-Grafana-User, X-Forwarded-User, X-Webauth-User, X-Auth-Request-User)
X-Scope-OrgID header (tenant)
X-Forwarded-For when -metrics.trust-proxy-headers=true
Remote IP (fallback)

Datasource/basic-auth credentials are tracked separately and are not used as client identity.

# Request rate per client
sum(rate(loki_vl_proxy_client_requests_total{system="loki",direction="downstream"}[5m])) by (client)

# Throughput per client (bytes/s)
sum(rate(loki_vl_proxy_client_response_bytes_total[5m])) by (client)

# P95 latency per client
histogram_quantile(0.95, sum(rate(loki_vl_proxy_client_request_duration_seconds_bucket{system="loki",direction="downstream"}[5m])) by (le, client))

# Top 10 clients by request count
topk(10, sum(rate(loki_vl_proxy_client_requests_total[5m])) by (client))

# Clients generating the most 429s
topk(10, sum(rate(loki_vl_proxy_client_status_total{status="429"}[5m])) by (client))

# Clients issuing the largest queries
topk(10, histogram_quantile(0.95, sum(rate(loki_vl_proxy_client_query_length_chars_bucket{system="loki",direction="downstream"}[5m])) by (le, client)))

Fleet Peer-Cache

# Current remote peers per proxy
loki_vl_proxy_peer_cache_peers

# Total fleet members in the hash ring
loki_vl_proxy_peer_cache_cluster_members

# Peer cache effectiveness
rate(loki_vl_proxy_peer_cache_hits_total[5m])
/
(rate(loki_vl_proxy_peer_cache_hits_total[5m]) + rate(loki_vl_proxy_peer_cache_misses_total[5m]))

# Peer fetch failure rate
rate(loki_vl_proxy_peer_cache_errors_total[5m])

Cache Efficiency

# Overall cache hit rate
loki_vl_proxy_cache_hits_total / (loki_vl_proxy_cache_hits_total + loki_vl_proxy_cache_misses_total)

# VL backend load (actual queries reaching VL)
sum(rate(loki_vl_proxy_backend_duration_seconds_count[5m]))

# Backend requests saved by coalescing
rate(loki_vl_proxy_coalesced_saved_total[5m])

Resource Utilization

# Heap usage vs limit
go_memstats_alloc_bytes / go_memstats_sys_bytes

# Active goroutines (proxy concurrency)
go_goroutines

# GC pressure
rate(go_gc_cycles_total[5m])

Availability Patterns

Single-Region HA

Minimum 3 replicas for HA
PDB ensures at least 2 pods during rolling updates
Anti-affinity spreads pods across nodes/zones
Proxy is stateless — any pod can serve any request

Multi-Region

Disk I/O Characteristics

The L2 disk cache uses bbolt (B+ tree) optimized for sequential I/O:

Operation	Latency	IOPS	Notes
Read (cache hit)	~22µs	~45,000/s	Sequential B+ tree scan
Write (batch flush)	~200µs/batch	~5,000 entries/s	Write-back buffer, async
Compaction	Background	Minimal	bbolt self-manages

Disk type recommendations:

gp3/gp2 SSD: Best for < 1,000 req/s
io2/io1 SSD: For > 1,000 req/s with high cache churn
st1 HDD: Viable for read-heavy, low-churn workloads (bbolt's sequential I/O is HDD-friendly)

Cost Estimation

Example: AWS EKS, us-east-1, 1,000 req/s workload

Component	Spec	Monthly Cost
4x t3.medium pods	2 vCPU, 4GB RAM	~$120
4x 10GB gp3 volumes	3,000 IOPS, 125 MB/s	~$14
VictoriaLogs (backend)	Varies	Varies
Total proxy infra		~$134/month

Treat this as proxy-only infrastructure cost, not a full backend comparison. Actual Loki versus VictoriaLogs economics depend on ingestion profile, retention window, storage class, and query mix. Loki's own docs note that high-cardinality labels hurt performance and cost-effectiveness, while VictoriaLogs publishes lower-RAM and lower-disk claims and third-party case studies report materially lower CPU, RAM, and storage usage on search-heavy workloads. Use the route-aware metrics and cache ratios in this project to validate the savings against your own traffic rather than assuming a fixed multiplier.

Resource Model​

Resource Projections​

Single Replica​

Disk Cache (L2)​

Fleet (Multiple Replicas)​

Workload Profiles​

Dashboard-Heavy (Grafana auto-refresh)​

Explore-Heavy (Ad-hoc queries)​

Mixed (Production Typical)​

Helm Values by Scale​

Small (< 100 req/s)​

Medium (100-1,000 req/s)​

Large (1,000-10,000 req/s)​

Monitoring Metrics​

Per-Tenant (Rate, Throughput, Latency)​

Per-Client (User Identity)​

Fleet Peer-Cache​

Cache Efficiency​

Resource Utilization​

Availability Patterns​

Single-Region HA​

Multi-Region​

Disk I/O Characteristics​

Cost Estimation​